Skip to main content

CFP Selection, Explained.

Selection Room is an independent analytics workspace for projecting the College Football Playoff field, auditing the bubble, comparing model vs committee, and testing selection assumptions. See who's in, who's out, why the bracket changes, and where a transparent model disagrees with the committee.

Not affiliated with the CFP, NCAA, ESPN, or any conference.

Selection Room

Live analysis workspace

2025 · Week 15 · Base Projection
First-round byes
1

Indiana

Big Ten

AUTO0.924
2

Ohio State

Big Ten

AT-LARGE0.834
3

Georgia

SEC

AUTO0.819
4

Texas Tech

Big 12

AUTO0.801
First-round games
5

Oregon

Big Ten

AT-LARGE0.773
6

Alabama

SEC

AT-LARGE0.740
7

Oklahoma

SEC

AT-LARGE0.718
8

Notre Dame

FBS Independents

AT-LARGE0.705
9

Ole Miss

SEC

AT-LARGE0.702
10

Texas A&M

SEC

AT-LARGE0.689
11

Tulane

American Athletic

AUTO0.570
12

James Madison

Sun Belt

AUTO0.567
Bubble watch

Last in

Notre Dame0.705
Oklahoma0.718

First out

BYU0.676
Miami0.669

The November debate

Every November, the same questions come back.

Selection Room turns those debates into a transparent, testable workspace.

  1. 01Who is actually in?
  2. 02Who is being helped by the rules?
  3. 03Who is being punished by schedule, résumé, or predictive strength?
  4. 04And what does the committee appear to value?
01

Project the field

See the 12-team bracket, automatic bids, at-large teams, byes, and first-round matchups.

02

Audit the bubble

Track last teams in, first teams out, stability, and which assumptions move the cut line.

03

Compare the committee

See where Selection Room agrees or disagrees with the committee and what tendencies their rankings imply.

04

Test assumptions

Change factor weights in Scenario Lab and rerun the field under transparent rules.

The pipeline

From box scores to a defensible field.

Selection Room takes completed FBS results, builds a transparent ranking, applies CFP rules, and shows where the model and committee split.

  1. 01

    Games & results

    Every completed FBS result to date

  2. 02

    Four-factor model

    Résumé, predictive, strength of record, strength of schedule

  3. 03

    CFP rules

    Automatic bids, at-large teams, byes

  4. 04

    Projected field

    The seeded 12-team bracket

  5. 05

    Committee comparison

    Where the model and committee split

The workspace

Five surfaces, one rule engine.

Dashboard

The projected field

The full 12-team bracket with seeds, bids, and composite scores from the live run — byes up top, first-round games below.

Byes

1

Indiana

Big Ten

AUTO0.924
2

Ohio State

Big Ten

AT-LARGE0.834
3

Georgia

SEC

AUTO0.819
4

Texas Tech

Big 12

AUTO0.801

First round

5

Oregon

Big Ten

AT-LARGE0.773
6

Alabama

SEC

AT-LARGE0.740
7

Oklahoma

SEC

AT-LARGE0.718
8

Notre Dame

FBS Independents

AT-LARGE0.705
Open dashboard
Bracket

Follow the path

Every pod is filled from the same engine, byes waiting in the quarterfinal.

Pod A8/9 → 1
First-round byeQuarterfinal · bowl site
Winner meets No. 1 Indiana·at Notre Dame
Open full bracket
Bubble

Watch the cut line

Last teams in and first teams out, with the margin that separates them.

Open bubble board
Scenario Lab

Stress the assumptions

Perturb the factor weights and see which teams hold their spot and which slip.

Run a sensitivity sweep to preview weight stress tests.

Open Scenario Lab
Validation

Checked against history

Compared to prior committee fields across a decade of finished seasons.

78%Average top-12 overlap
View validation

Committee Tendencies

Research-only

See what the committee's rankings appear to value.

After each CFP ranking release, Selection Room estimates which factor mix best approximates the committee's published top 25 under a transparent four-factor model. Not a formula. Not a claim about secret weights. A way to inspect what the rankings imply.

View Committee Tendencies
Weight comparison
BaselineFit approximation

These weights are descriptive approximations, not the committee's actual weights. Research-only; they do not change Selection Room's production model.

Built to be checked

Validated against a decade of committee fields.

Selection Room validates against prior committee fields, top-12 overlap, field overlap, and game-level predictive checks.

2024 committee field overlap
11/12

2024 committee field overlap

Average top-12 overlap
78%

Average top-12 overlap

Historical validation window
2014–2024

Historical validation window

Full validation breakdown

Who it's for

Built for people who live in the selection debate.

Fans, writers, podcasters, analysts, and college football people who want a transparent audit layer.

Fans

Understand why your team is in or out.

Media

Get clear visuals for the bubble debate.

Analysts

Test assumptions and compare committee behavior.

Explore the 2025 field.

Test your own selection assumptions. See where the model and committee disagree.